In the past couple of years, I have become
very selective about what I read. Other
than reading the Food Network Magazine subscribed to by my mother-in-law, I
rarely read a magazine. I find the
content and visual images of many women’s magazines to be a place of temptation
– even in the grocery line. And so I “avoid
the near temptation of sin”.
Recently, as I was waiting for my fingernail
polish to dry in a salon, I perused the magazines. I avoided Star, OK, In Touch
and even People for an edition of Redbook.
What harm could there be in reading this mainstay of women’s
magazines? As turned the pages and
skimmed the copy, I decided to read an article titled the Best Love Stories of
2012. (Note that the article clearly touted love, not sex or erotica.)
The article mentioned the royal couple
William and Kate who are sweet in public and have been horrified at having
their private moments splashed across the tabloids. I turned the page to find
an article on the “Smorgasbord of eye candy this year” avowing that women are
“loud and proud in our appreciation”. There was a photo of a famous male in a skimpy
bathing suit and the article suggested another man to “Google if you want to
get the home fires burning - but don’t do it at work”. The take away was that “your
husband doesn’t care what’s got you so worked up, as long as he reaps the
benefits”. I actually read the sentence
twice. I don’t know about other men, but my husband
would not be happy knowing that I am fantasizing about another man while we make
love.
The next article about “love” touted the
effect a soft porn novel has had on martial sex, stating that the movie version
“can’t come fast enough”. Since when is
lust no longer a sin I thought as I slapped the magazine shut and moved it far
away from my seat.
This mainstream women’s magazine is promoting
activity that not only diminishes the value of the intimate marriage
relationship, but promotes sinful behavior as something to boast about. I closed my eyes and my mind ranted at the
outrage of including this material in an article about love. A Casting Crowns song came to mind. I can’t remember its name, but the lyrics
include “be careful what your eyes see”.
The harms of lust are more far reaching than
our current society will admit. When sex
is a form of recreation, not an act of creation or comfort, it damages the love
between wife and husband. And we, the
women of today, have bought into the current culture’s theme that sex is far
more important than love.
We do need to be careful what our eyes, the
eyes of our husbands, and the eyes of our children see. How much of the crumbling family structure
can be blamed on confusing love with erotica?
No comments:
Post a Comment